Nordic Ideology has a pretty good response to anarcho-syndicalism: > What, then, about anarcho-capitalism, one might ask? In this extreme version of liberalism you want to get rid of the state altogether and even have a market solution for buying and selling security services such as policing and courts. Let’s take it from the anarcho-capitalist perspective then: no state, basta! Anarcho-capitalists are not uncommon around hacker communities, Silicon Valley and the tech industries, so it is a relevant question. And with cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies on the rise, we may be seeing increasingly serious attempts at anarcho-capitalist projects. > > Here’s the thing. Even if you had no state and security was up for sale, the best security solutions would still be those that provide people with a “listening society” so that people feel heard, seen and represented. The best security is still preventive security. This would in turn require a development of all the six forms of politics. In market terms, this service would be more competitive. > > Imagine you’re a “client-citizen” of the kind envisioned by anarcho-capitalists: You have blockchain money and you shop around for the best state services. In one such state service, the metamodern one, you can affect the mode of governance, people are nudged to treat you better and you get a framework that helps you find profound meaning in life, and the fellow citizens will be much more peaceful and socially intelligent, and it’s all empirically proven to work. The other providers lack such services and end up using your voluntarily paid money much more inefficiently. Which one are you going to pick? You go with the metamodern one. If there is such a thing as your “natural rights”, these will come to a fuller expression in a metamodern society. [[Digital Garden/Metamodernism|Metamodernism]]